[add-art dev] Drupal vs. Wordpress for Add-Art site
Steve Lambert
steve at visitsteve.com
Sat May 30 15:07:35 PDT 2009
Ah yes, good point. The old did run rather slow...
Any arguments for Drupal? Opinions at all?
Steve
P.S. I typrd tgis on my phpne!
--
http://visitsteve.com
On May 30, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Daniel Caleb Thompson <daniel.thompson at galerie-eigenheim.de
> wrote:
> there is one more con to drupal:
>
> server overhead. once you are using a few custom views and more than
> 10plugins the site (even when cached) really slows down...
>
> Daniel Caleb Thompson
> http://bauhauslab.org
> +49 (0) 15 202 409 809
>
> A man walks into a bar. The bartender asks him what he wants.
> "Nothing," he says. "So why did you come in here for nothing?"
> "Because nothing is better than a dry martini."
>
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Steve Lambert
> <steve at visitsteve.com> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Just wanted to open some discussion I've been having with a few of
> you about possibly moving the Add-Art site to wordpress. Thanks to
> Alyssa and some help here at Eyebeam we've got drupal updated to the
> latest version but there's still a lot of work to get it where we
> need it. Here's some thoughts, please add yours and we'll figure out
> which way to go.
>
> Steve
>
>
> Drupal:
> Pros
> - Allows us to create super custom forms that ensure we get the
> right size images.
> - Potential to code out features that will help (someday) fully
> automate add-art.
> - It's running an kinda gets the job done - though we need to do
> some work to get the old galleries to display
>
> Cons:
> - No one on our team knows it really well
> - usability for people approaching it cold is tricky.
> - updates are labor intensive.
>
> Wordpress:
>
> Pros
> - a lot of us know it very well
> - more users will be already familiar with it and usability barriers
> are lower
> - greg is hot to code the redesign in WP
>
> Cons
> - not as extensible. Could hit limits
> - potentially less able to fully automate add-art
>
>
> Misc:
> If our new goal is to take feeds, maybe automating the whole process
> is a lower priority.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Supperclub mailing list
> Supperclub at lists.add-art.org
> http://lists.add-art.org/listinfo.cgi/supperclub-add-art.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Supperclub mailing list
> Supperclub at lists.add-art.org
> http://lists.add-art.org/listinfo.cgi/supperclub-add-art.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.add-art.org/pipermail/supperclub-add-art.org/attachments/20090530/cc54ebce/attachment.htm>
More information about the Supperclub
mailing list