[add-art dev] Caching the updated art images

[Steve Lambert]

can we throw up a little "download now" dialog box out of firefox?

SL


On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Ethan Ham wrote:

> Here's something that might be an issue: putting the jpegs into xml  
> makes
> the data twice as heavy (~11MB instead of ~6MB).  This is because  
> the image
> data has to be converted to Base64 so as to avoid breaking the xml.
>
> Is 11MB acceptable for a download size?
>
>
> On 6/3/08 6:17 PM, "Ethan Ham" <ethan at ethanham.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty close to having the art updating nicely (along with a  
>> utility for
>> packaging the art into xml for download).
>>
>> But I wanted to check and make sure people are happy with how I'm  
>> caching
>> the art... I'm moving the art images out of the .jar file and have  
>> them
>> simply residing in an "images" folder under the chrome folder.
>>
>> I looked around briefly to see if there's a way to dynamically  
>> update a jar
>> file using Javascript, but didn't see anything... So I figured it  
>> probably
>> wasn't a big deal if I simply have the jpegs in an uncompressed  
>> directory.
>>
>> Ethan
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Supperclub mailing list
>> Supperclub at lists.add-art.org
>> http://lists.add-art.org/listinfo.cgi/supperclub-add-art.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Supperclub mailing list
> Supperclub at lists.add-art.org
> http://lists.add-art.org/listinfo.cgi/supperclub-add-art.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.add-art.org/pipermail/supperclub-add-art.org/attachments/20080604/7ff54f56/attachment.htm>